News & Intel
LiveDaily AI-curated intelligence on Palantir Foundry, Ontology, AIP, Apollo, contracts, and community feedback. Updated automatically via GitHub Actions every day at 7 AM UTC.
Daily Palantir Intelligence Briefing — Friday, April 10, 2026
Key Development
Palantir's AI systems are central to US strike operations against Iran, compressing the "kill chain" in what is described as the first major AI-driven conflict. The integration of Palantir's AI into Pentagon targeting operations signifies a critical inflection point for the company's defense business. This operational deployment, directly impacting kinetic actions and potentially shaping geopolitical outcomes, validates the strategic importance of Palantir's platforms in high-stakes national security environments. It also raises significant questions about the ethical implications and long-term strategic posture of AI-enabled warfare.
Contracts & Government
- US Army developing proprietary chatbot for combat information: The US Army is reportedly building its own AI chatbot, trained on real military data, to deliver mission-critical information to soldiers. This initiative, while not directly involving Palantir, underscores the broader government drive towards leveraging AI for operational advantage, potentially creating both competitive pressure and partnership opportunities.
- Anthropic's legal bid to block Pentagon blacklisting denied: A federal appeals court has denied Anthropic's request for a stay in its lawsuit against the Department of Defense. This outcome suggests a continued trajectory for the Pentagon's vendor evaluation processes, which could impact the competitive landscape for AI providers engaging with defense contracts.
Product & Platform Updates
- C3.ai debuts agentic tool for autonomous application development: C3.ai has launched C3 Code, a new platform designed to autonomously transform natural language prompts into production-ready enterprise applications. This development signals increasing competition in the agentic AI development space, potentially impacting the demand for traditional platform solutions as low-code/no-code AI development tools mature.
Market & Business
- Palantir shares down 5% amidst valuation concerns and UK scrutiny: Palantir experienced a 5% stock price decline, attributed to ongoing valuation concerns and increased regulatory scrutiny in the UK. This sentiment highlights investor sensitivity to market expectations and the impact of external regulatory environments on growth-stage technology companies.
- Michael Burry views Anthropic as a threat, citing AI spending shifts: Noted investor Michael Burry believes Anthropic is outperforming Palantir in the enterprise AI market, citing Anthropic's ease of integration as a key factor for businesses. This commentary reflects a perceived shift in enterprise AI adoption trends, favoring simpler integration models.
- Startup Patlytics raises $40 million for AI in patent law: Patlytics, an AI startup focusing on patent law, secured $40 million in funding after achieving significant traction with AmLaw 100 firms and experiencing rapid revenue growth. This highlights the expanding application of AI in specialized professional services and the potential for disruptive niche players.
Strategic Implications
- For Enterprise Customers: The proliferation of specialized AI solutions (like Patlytics) and the increasing focus on agentic development platforms (like C3 Code) suggest a maturing market with diverse options for automation. Customers should evaluate whether integrated platforms like Palantir's Foundry and AIP offer superior strategic advantages over specialized, point-solution AI tools.
- For Developers: The development of internal government AI solutions and the competitive pressure from companies like Anthropic emphasize the need for continuous innovation and clear value propositions. Developers building on or with Palantir's platforms should focus on demonstrating differentiated capabilities, particularly in complex, mission-critical domains where Palantir has established a foothold.
Python packages with native C++ bindings crash in published Functions (work in preview)
Python Function with OR-Tools CP-SAT works in live preview but consistently fails when called from a Workshop function-backed variable I have a Python Function that uses Google’s OR-Tools CP-SAT solver to optimize assignment of personnel to requirements (classic assignment problem). The function works perfectly in live preview in platform VSCode every time, but consistently fails when called from a Workshop function-backed string variable with this error: RawClientError(hyper_util::client::legacy::Error(SendRequest, hyper::Error(Io, Custom { kind: UnexpectedEof, error: "peer closed connection without sending TLS close_notify" }))) It has worked a couple of times from Workshop, but very intermittently. The vast majority of calls fail. What I’ve verified: Function works consistently in live preview in platform VSCode (tested dozens of times) Function consistently fails when called from a Workshop function-backed variable, works very rarely The error doesn
How to display Edit History for an object in OSDK / custom React app (outside Workshop)?
In Workshop, there’s a built-in Edits History widget that shows the full audit trail of changes made to an ontology object via Actions. It displays who changed what, when, and the previous vs. new values. When building a custom front-end with OSDK (TypeScript / React), this widget is not available out of the box. How can we replicate this functionality? 4 posts - 2 participants Read full topic
Access properties from object type
I currently have 2 object types and they are linked. Currently, when used in a ObjectTable - I can directly access the proeprties of the of the main table in the column configuration. But the other objectType’s properties can only be accessed as a linked objects properties(the showAPI names in object table widget in workshop are named as link_column , link_column1…). This limits the export capabilities, as I have no access over how I can directly choose the properties dynamically and then exporting. Is there already a solution for these problems already? 1 post - 1 participant Read full topic
How to execute code in a Foundry Agent?
I would like to let my agent execute arbitrary code within a containerized/safe environment, depending on the user permissions. The goal could be to make specific queries to the ontology, or to read/write files stored in the ontology, etc. How can I do this ? 3 posts - 2 participants Read full topic
I want to add Palantir user with different organization in my developer tier account with role based access control
In my developer tier account I want to add users who have Palantir developer tier account but all the users should have individual workspace and should not be able to access each others task.As I will be the admin I will have full access but the child users will have viewer access for all project other than him/her. How can I create such instance here in Palantir Foundry 2 posts - 2 participants Read full topic
Insight, has a scrolling issue with objects with large amount of fields
With 78 fields, the left right scroll bar doesn’t size correctly on initial load. As you scroll right, it tries to resize 1 post - 1 participant Read full topic
[nit] Typo in Insight app UI
The description of the Intersect option in the new Insight app has a grammar error. “Keep only items that are appear …” → “Keep only items that appear …” 1 post - 1 participant Read full topic
Error with Pilot
I put a prompt and context into pilot for something I wanted to build and got the following error. When I do a hard refresh I get the CSP error the other post got (error below image). Any advice to troubleshoot? Thank you! 2 posts - 1 participant Read full topic
Restricting user access to a single space in a Palantir Dev Tier environment and managing permissions through group-based roles.
Hello, I’m currently working on a Training POC project using the Dev Tier Edition. Within my organization, I’ve created a dedicated Space intended for secondary users to collaborate. I’ve added these secondary users (who already have Dev Tier Palantir accounts), but I want to restrict their access so they can only work within this single designated space. At the moment, they are able to access the entire organization. Additionally, within this space, I would like to create user groups and assign roles or permissions based on those groups to control access more granularly. Could you please guide me on how to: Restrict users to a single space within the organization, and Implement group-based access control within that space? Thanks in advance! 1 post - 1 participant Read full topic
Custom Text Extraction for Tracked-Deletion Text in Word Documents
Hey everyone! I’m working on a Foundry pipeline where users upload redlined Word documents (.docx), and an LLM in AIP Logic compares proposed deletions against gold-standard language stored in an ontology object. The AI reasoning side is mostly sorted — my blocker is the preprocessing step. The Problem: Foundry’s native text extraction and AIP’s built-in document handling don’t appear to have a way to detect and tag tracked-deletion text (strikethrough / <w:del> nodes in the underlying Word XML). I need a custom function that: Reads the raw .docx file Parses the underlying XML (or converts to HTML) to identify tracked deletions Returns plain text with deleted segments specially tagged (e.g. wrapped in <strikethrough> tags) before the text ever reaches AIP Logic What I’ve Tried: Python Functions API — media references don’t appear to be supported yet, which is a blocker since uploaded docs come in as media references via a media set TypeScript
Function-backed action type in Workshop Scenarios on global branch
Problem: Function-backed action type cannot be used in Workshop scenario on a global branch Environment: Code Repository: Master branch (Python Functions) Ontology/Workshop: Global branch Error Message: Error running scenario Error: [Actions] CannotFindActionTypes Error ID: a40d0bed-….. invalidActionTypeRids: [“ri.actions.main.action-type.2a44…..”] What Works: Function works in preview Function is published Other functions from same repository work in Workshop on this global branch Action type exists on global branch with correct RID Action type configuration is correct (function-backed, no errors) What Doesn’t Work: Workshop scenario cannot find the action type (error above) What I’ve Tried: Verified RID matches Recreated action step in scenario Confirmed permissions Question: Is there a known limitation with function-backed action types in Workshop scenarios when
Can a $10,000 Investment in Palantir Technologies Turn Into $1 Million by 2035?
If you click 'Accept all', we and our partners, including 251 who are part of the IAB Transparency & Consent Framework, will also store and / or access information on a device (in other words, us… [+1046 chars]
We All Hate AI, but if You’re Poor, It Can Really Ruin Your Life
Kali Holloway Debt collection. Parole decisions. Oversight of public services. It’s all being outsourced to AI, with terrible consequences for poor people. The post We All Hate AI, but if You’re Poor, It Can Really Ruin Your Life appeared first on Th…
A startup building the Harvey for patent law has raised $40 million
Patlytics raised the new funding after securing more than 40% of the AmLaw 100 firms and growing revenue about 10x in a single year.
How the math works on a $1.75 trillion SpaceX valuation
SpaceX is targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation for its upcoming IPO, aiming to raise over $75 billion. This valuation is driven by its profitable Starlink satellite network and a leading launch business, with investors also factoring in future potential from …
When Flock Comes to Town: Why Cities Are Axing the Controversial Surveillance Technology
Flock Safety surveillance equipment is appearing in neighborhoods across the country. I spoke with experts about the tech, laws and privacy issues at play.
Palantir's AI Powers US Strikes in Iran War, Speeding 'Kill Chain' in First Major AI-Driven Conflict
WASHINGTON — As U.S. and Israeli forces have unleashed more than 11,000 strikes on Iranian targets since late February 2026, Palantir Technologies' artificial intelligence systems have emerged as a central tool in the Pentagon's targeting operations, compress…
How the math works on a $1.75 trillion SpaceX valuation
SpaceX would immediately become the sixth most-valuable publicly listed US firm, worth more than the likes of Meta Platforms, which has been publicly listed for more than a decade, and Berkshire Hathaway, a company older than SpaceX founder Elon Musk.