News & Intel
LiveDaily AI-curated intelligence on Palantir Foundry, Ontology, AIP, Apollo, contracts, and community feedback. Updated automatically via GitHub Actions every day at 7 AM UTC.
Stock Indexes Mixed Ahead of Alphabet’s Earnings
The S&P 500 Index ($SPX ) (SPY ) today is down -0.09%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($DOWI ) (DIA ) is up +0.10%, and the Nasdaq 100 Index ($IUXX ) (QQQ...
Prediction: ServiceNow Stock Will Soar After Earnings if It Delivers on This AI Metric
ServiceNow has been cut nearly in half over the past year, but one AI metric reporting tonight could flip the entire recovery thesis in a single session.
Cloudflare Stock Is Not a Buy Despite Its Strong Outlook. Here’s Why.
NET stock has a very high valuation and faces tough competition.
Micron and Sandisk Are Surging: Can the Rally Last Through 2027?
The hottest artificial intelligence (AI) stocks this year are not names like Nvidia and Palantir Technologies, which have put on a clinic in recent years and generated phenomenal returns for shareholders. This year, parts of the AI supply chain have come into…
ICE Illegally Scooped Up Medicaid Data, Then Shared It with Palantir
HN Discussion — 3 comments · 67 points.
Functions Repo + React Frontend
Type Safety and Drift Between Functions Repo and React App — Is This the Intended Pattern? I’m using a Functions repo as the primary layer for queries and actions against my ontology — both as a resource for others (workshops, quiver, etc.) and as the backbone of my own React application via an OSDK-based SDK. The problem: because Workshop has historically had inconsistent support for structured types, I’ve defaulted to using strings instead of properly typed objects throughout my functions. This means by the time I’m in my React app, I’ve already lost type inference. I end up redefining types in both repos, and even though I control both, the drift risk is real. I considered publishing a shared NPM package to centralize the type definitions, but that feels like the wrong abstraction inside Palantir — I’d essentially be papering over a gap in the platform rather than using it correctly. Questions Is the string-over-struct approach a known workaround, or am I genuinely m
User-delegated authentication from a Custom Widget to an external system
Hi, I’m investigating how to preserve individual user identity when a Foundry Custom Widget triggers operations in an external system. Users authenticate to Foundry through enterprise SSO. The external system has its own OIDC-compatible identity and permission model, and every write must be attributed to the actual user rather than a shared service account. What is the recommended supported pattern for this? Is there an on-behalf-of or token-exchange flow between Foundry and an external identity provider? Can an Action or webhook receive a cryptographically verifiable identity for the Foundry user who invoked it? Can a Custom Widget access any user-delegated token intended for an external audience, or is its runtime token strictly for Foundry APIs? I want to avoid passing an unverified user identifier in the request body or treating a service credential as an individual user. 2 posts - 2 participants Read full topic
Prediction: This Could Be Palantir's Stock Price By the End of 2027
There's no two ways about it: Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) is a battleground stock. Bulls argue that the company's proprietary artificial intelligence (AI)-infused decision-making matrix -- dubbed Ontology -- has no real competition, which is driving …
Court Filings Reveal Medicaid Patient Data Was Improperly Shared with ICE, Then Forwarded to Palantir's Deportation App
Court filings revealed July 17 that Medicaid data on millions of Americans was improperly shared with ICE, then sent to Palantir's ELITE deportation app. Here's what enrollees need to know.
Prediction: Palantir Stock Will Go Parabolic After Aug. 3. Here's Why
If you click 'Accept all', we and our partners, including 250 who are part of the IAB Transparency & Consent Framework, will also store and / or access information on a device (in other words, us… [+1046 chars]
Prediction: Palantir Stock Will Go Parabolic After Aug. 3. Here's Why
Shares of Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) have shed 20% of their value in 2026 as of this writing, driven mainly by the broader weakness in artificial intelligence (AI) stocks and the company's expensive valuation. However, Palantir stock could get a big…
Palantir Stock Is Down More Than 35% from Its Peak. Is It Finally a Buy?
Just a few months ago, investors couldn't get enough of Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR). The company -- known for "big data" analytics -- was delivering record earnings, demand for its artificial intelligence (AI) software was surging, and the stock seem…
STARTRADER Introduces 24/7 US Stock CFDs Across NVIDIA, Apple, Meta, and Leading Global Equities
STARTRADER today launches 42 new 24/5 US Stock CFDs and announces the introduction of 43 new 24/7 US Stock CFDs from 27 July 2026, expanding its offering to 85 new instruments
STARTRADER Introduces 24/7 US Stock CFDs Across NVIDIA, Apple, Meta, and Leading Global Equities
STARTRADER today launches 42 new 24/5 US Stock CFDs and announces the introduction of 43 new 24/7 US Stock CFDs from 27 July 2026, expanding its offering to 85 new instruments. DUBAI, UAE, July 22, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- STARTRADER today announced the launch of…
Candid Health raises $120 million to take on America’s $280 billion medical billing mess
The healthcare infrastructure startup tripled its valuation in 18 months as revenue grew nearly 200 percent.
ICE shared Medicaid data it wasn't supposed to have with Palantir
HN Discussion — 20 comments · 94 points.
When will GPT-5.6 Sol/Terra/Luna, Grok 4.5, and Claude Fable 5 be available in AIP?
Hi Palantir team! What is the expected timeline for adding the following models to AIP’s Language Model Service? GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna Grok 4.5 Claude Fable 5 For GPT-5.6 and Grok 4.5, when should we expect them to become available? For Claude Fable 5, which has been generally available since June 9 but is still not listed as a supported AIP model, is it planned for addition? Anthropic states that Fable 5 requires 30-day data retention and is not available under ZDR. Does that requirement affect whether or when it will become available in AIP? We’re interested in using these models across AIP workflows and comparing their performance for our use cases through AIP Evals. Could you also share whether support will extend across AIP Logic, Functions, transforms, agents, and Evals? Thanks! 2 posts - 2 participants Read full topic
Palantir Could Hit a $400 Billion Market Cap by the End of 2027, and Here Is Why Investors Should Pay Attention
Palantir Could Hit a $400 Billion Market Cap by the End of 2027, and Here Is Why Investors Should Pay Attention Let me put a realistic number on the table before anyone gets carried away. Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) could carry a market value of roug…